<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld/</link>
	<description>Bringing happiness and joy to the masses.  Sunshine, anyone?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grumpasaurus.com &#187; Oh, to hell with it</title>
		<link>http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpasaurus.com &#187; Oh, to hell with it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld-the-rule-of-law-survives/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] The GOP/Busheviks are apparently giving up all pretenses of being law abiding or accepting a Bill of Rights and are now attempting to redefine Common Article III of the Geneva Conventions (you know, the one that prohibits cruel treatment, torture and the like. The one that was used to find Gitmo unconstitutional in Hamdan). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GOP/Busheviks are apparently giving up all pretenses of being law abiding or accepting a Bill of Rights and are now attempting to redefine Common Article III of the Geneva Conventions (you know, the one that prohibits cruel treatment, torture and the like. The one that was used to find Gitmo unconstitutional in Hamdan). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpasaurus.com &#187; Bush rewriting War Crimes Act</title>
		<link>http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpasaurus.com &#187; Bush rewriting War Crimes Act</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld-the-rule-of-law-survives/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] In other words&#8230; the thugs in the administration are now concerned that all of those things which have always been illegal and which the SCOTUS confirmed were illegal in Hamdan &#8230; may just be coming back to haunt them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In other words&#8230; the thugs in the administration are now concerned that all of those things which have always been illegal and which the SCOTUS confirmed were illegal in Hamdan &#8230; may just be coming back to haunt them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chartoo</title>
		<link>http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>chartoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grumpasaurus.com/2006/06/29/hamdan-v-rumsfeld-the-rule-of-law-survives/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I was shocked when I read this story.
Couldn&#039;t believe that the Supreme Court handed down a ruling contrary to current White House policy.

 ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shocked when I read this story.<br />
Couldn&#8217;t believe that the Supreme Court handed down a ruling contrary to current White House policy.</p>
<p> <img src='http://grumpasaurus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
